Immigration Facts for School Leaders

Type: Talking Points
Topics: Communications & Public Relations, Immigration

January 22, 2025

Due to recent government actions including the rescinding of a 2021 memo on “protected areas” that included schools, the subject of immigration has been widely discussed across the country.

Specifically, there are concerns that increasing efforts to deport undocumented individuals living in the United States will play out in schools and other places where children gather, learn and receive essential services.

It is important to understand that, by law, a child's immigration status (or that of their parents) does not affect their right to receive a public education.

As always, school leaders are focused on providing a safe and welcoming learning environment where every student can grow, thrive and learn how to contribute productively to society. AASA recognizes the current environment around immigration may raise serious concerns within your community. We are here to assist our members in any way we can, and we encourage you to take advantage of the resources and supports available when making your plans and coordinating your outreach.

AASA Members: Login to view high-level talking points

This Content is Exclusive to Members

AASA Member? Login to Access the Full Resource

Not a Member? Join Now | Learn More About Membership

FAQs

The following information was originally posted to The Leading Edge, AASA's Advocacy & Policy blog.

There are reports that a new memo from the Trump Administration rescinds a 2021 memo by DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas that designated schools, as well as other community services as “protected areas”. This 2021 rule stated that to the extent possible, ICE agents should not carry out any enforcement activities in these locations. This policy change was reported on January 21, 2025 by Fox News, who was provided with a draft of the memo, and referenced in a statement by Acting Homeland Security Secretary Benjamine Huffman.

“Going forward, law enforcement officers should continue to use that discretion along with a healthy dose of common sense." the new memo states. "It is not necessary, however, for the head of the agency to create bright line rules regarding where our immigration laws are permitted to be enforced."

At this time, it is unclear whether this policy change will mean that ICE enforcement activities will take place on school property, but it allows for the possibility. AASA will continue to monitor this issue and update this blog post as necessary.

Below is information for education leaders based on questions we have received. This is for informational purposes only. As always, we recommend consulting with your legal counsel to determine what is best for your district, staff and students.

What legal protections exist for students and student data?

The landmark Plyler v. Doe Supreme Court case established that all children, regardless of immigration status, have the right to a public education. Schools cannot deny a student a public education based on immigration status.

The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) protects the privacy of student education records and restricts the sharing of personally identifiable information (PII) without parental consent. This includes data that might indirectly reveal a student’s immigration status. FERPA applies to all educational institutions that receive funding under any program administered by the U.S. Department of Education, including K-12 schools and colleges/universities. Importantly, FERPA explicitly supersedes any conflicting state laws that attempt to mandate the release of protected student data. Additionally, FERPA generally prohibits schools from sharing student records with immigration or law enforcement agencies without consent or a judicial order. For more information: Law Enforcement Access to Student Records – A guide for School Administrators & Ed Service Providers

It is anticipated that ICE agents may request data from schools. Ensure that all of your staff are trained on the protections of students' data under FERPA.

If ICE officers arrive at my school, do I have to let them in?

It depends. There are two types of warrants: administrative and judicial.

School administrators must allow access to the school if ICE officers present a judicial warrant. If ICE presents an administrative warrant, they cannot enter a home, school, or private space without explicit permission but schools may still choose to cooperate with ICE enforcement and grant permission if that aligns with district policies; but the appropriate parental consent should be obtained before allowing any interview with a student. ICE agents do not generally have authority to enter school property that is not otherwise open to the public.

What should I do to prepare for potential ICE enforcement on school grounds?

Develop a protocol or policy for how to deal with ICE enforcement and ensure all staff know what to do under these circumstances. This can look like the following:

  • Welcome the agent(s).
  • Ask them to provide identification.
  • Make a copy of their ID Inform Building Principal AND District Office administration.
  • Ask the agent(s) if they have any paperwork (i.e., subpoena, warrant, etc.). Ask to make copies of the paperwork for the Board of Education’s attorney to review.
  • Ask the agent(s) to sit in the office while Principal / Admin arrive. Alternatively, you can ask them to sit in a more private area such as the Principal’s conference room.
  • Keep notes of the date/time, names and titles of the agents, who you contacted at District Office, the name of the student or staff member they are inquiring about (if known), etc.

It may be best to have one point of contact for schools who are well-versed on the legal requirements of the different types of warrants. For example, New York City Public Schools’ protocol designates that principals are responsible for interacting with non-local law enforcement agents. It may also help to have a visual checklist of the difference between an administrative warrant and a judicial warrant.

What if an ICE agent asks to interview a student on school property?

Once again, ICE agents must have the appropriate warrant. If immigration officials request an interview with a student, the Superintendent should consult the school district’s attorney before taking any action. Failure to protect a student’s legal rights against action by immigration officials could subject a school district to legal liability.

The agent must have a valid warrant. School Districts should not give ICE agents access to students on school property without a valid warrant. If ICE agents present a valid warrant, they should be given access to students in a manner that is discreet, private, and away from other students. Because students have a right to attend school regardless of immigration status, a student’s mere attendance at school does not violate the law or create an exigent circumstance that would support ICE having access to a student (including a student’s school records) without a warrant or court order.

A child also has the right against self-incrimination and may not be required to provide any information that would establish his or her residency status. The child should be advised of the right to remain silent. The Superintendent should notify parents that immigration officials have requested an interview with the child.

What is the difference between an administrative warrant and a judicial warrant? How can educators identify what they are looking at?

Administrative warrants are issues by an ICE officer or another official at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS); a judicial warrant is issued by a judge or magistrate in a federal or state court. To be valid, a judicial warrant must: 1) be issued by a judicial court, 2) be signed by a state or federal judge or magistrate, 3) state the address of the premises to be searched — make sure the stated address is your address or specifically pertains to you, and 4) be executed within the time period specified on the warrant. A judicial warrant will have a court’s name (I.e. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California), while an administrative warrant will have another agency/organization listed.

If ICE agents approach a student on school grounds, but outside of school, what should school staff do?

School personnel stand in loco parentis to a child whenever the child is on school grounds, even in public areas. School staff should determine whether ICE agents have a warrant to detain or arrest the student.

If they do not have a warrant, school staff should escort the child to the school office. If they do have a warrant, school staff should escort the student and the ICE agents to the school office. Contact the central office to ensure legal review of the warrant prior to releasing the student to ICE agents.

Does the school district have to release records to ICE agents?

ICE has the right to access the same information about immigrants as any other student, which means they can request Directory Information if the School District has a policy designating Directory Information as available to the public.

Prior to giving access to Directory Information, school staff should be sure that parents of the student(s) in question have not opted out of Directory Information. For any other records request, ICE must deliver a judicial warrant or court order (either document signed by a judge) to obtain records. Even then your state laws may contain requirements for parental notice of the information to be released pursuant to the order, so check with legal counsel.

Students have a right to attend school regardless of immigration status, and their attendance at school does not violate any state or federal law, nor is it considered an exigent circumstance.

If school district staff knows of the immigration status of a student, can they be required to disclose it?

If ICE agents come to school and informally ask school staff about a student’s immigration status, even though the school does not collect that information, staff should not answer their questions without a warrant or court order. If school staff receive a warrant or court order, it should be provided to the central office prior to disclosure of records or information to ICE agents. The school district reserves the right to have staff accompanied by school district legal counsel anytime they are subpoenaed for questioning by ICE agents or law enforcement.

In the event school staff become aware that a student’s parents have been detained, but the student has not, what steps should be taken?

School staff should notify the administration of the parents’ detention to determine the student’s living situation and whether to make a call to the child welfare agency. If the student has no legal guardian and there is no paperwork filed regarding a delegation of parental responsibility, the child welfare agency must be called. If the student has a legal guardian that is not a resident of the school district, the student should be treated as homeless and allowed to stay enrolled in school for the remainder of the school year.

Facts:
  • About 1% of all public school students are undocumented.

  • 87% of the children of immigrants have U.S. citizenship.

  • The Supreme Court decision Plyler vs. Doe ruled that all children living in the United States - including children who are undocumented immigrants - are able to attend public school from kindergarten through 12th grade is still the law of the land.

  • School districts that either prohibit or discourage, or maintain policies that have the effect of prohibiting or discouraging, children from enrolling or attending schools because they or their parents/guardians are not U.S. citizens or are undocumented may be in violation of Federal law.

  • Research also finds that deportation threats and family separation are associated with decreased academic performance and increased likelihood of dropping out.

Advertisement

Advertisement


Advertisement

Advertisement